Which of the following is NOT a recognized supervisory style?

Which of the following is NOT a recognized supervisory style?

• A. Supportive
• B. Traditional
• C. Passive
• D. Active

Answer: (C)

The classification of supervisory styles typically involves approaches that encompass the dynamics between supervisors and their team members. Supportive, Traditional, and Active supervisory styles all embody recognizable frameworks that define how supervisors interact with their teams. A supportive supervisory style focuses on fostering a positive work environment, encouraging employee development, and addressing team members' needs. Similarly, a traditional style upholds established hierarchies and structures, emphasizing authority and clear directives. The active supervisory style promotes engagement and direct involvement in team activities, encouraging communication and collaboration. In contrast, a passive supervisory style is not widely recognized as a formal supervisory approach. Rather, it reflects a lack of engagement or initiative from the supervisor, which can lead to ambiguity and a lack of direction for the team. As such, it does not present a proactive strategy for managing or guiding employees, which is essential in effective supervisory practices. Understanding these dynamics helps clarify why the passive approach does not fit within the established frameworks of supervisory styles.

The classification of supervisory styles typically involves approaches that encompass the dynamics between supervisors and their team members. Supportive, Traditional, and Active supervisory styles all embody recognizable frameworks that define how supervisors interact with their teams.

A supportive supervisory style focuses on fostering a positive work environment, encouraging employee development, and addressing team members' needs. Similarly, a traditional style upholds established hierarchies and structures, emphasizing authority and clear directives. The active supervisory style promotes engagement and direct involvement in team activities, encouraging communication and collaboration.

In contrast, a passive supervisory style is not widely recognized as a formal supervisory approach. Rather, it reflects a lack of engagement or initiative from the supervisor, which can lead to ambiguity and a lack of direction for the team. As such, it does not present a proactive strategy for managing or guiding employees, which is essential in effective supervisory practices. Understanding these dynamics helps clarify why the passive approach does not fit within the established frameworks of supervisory styles.